Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews Detailedly

Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews Detailedly

Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews – The costly Air must throttle earlier. Following our testing of the basic model, we obtained the faster version of the current MacBook Air with 16 GB of RAM, a big 1-TB SSD, as well as the faster 10-core GPU version of the M2 and put it through its paces. The graphics update, on the other hand, is especially disappointing because the inactively cooled MacBook Air M2 requires to throttle its effective delivery.

Here are all the Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews we would like to share with you after doing the test on it.

Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews: Case – The color starlight is significantly less susceptible.

Case - The color starlight is significantly less susceptible.
Case – The color starlight is significantly less susceptible.

With the new MacBook Air M2 in Midnight, we discovered while the dark blue color looks fantastic, it is also very prone to dirt and fingerprints. In these regards, the recent test unit in the also innovative Starlight color version is significantly less susceptible and equates more to the known Silver and Space Gray versions.

Although the new MacBook Air M2 is very thin, it still has a larger footprint than direct competitors like the Dell XPS 13 Plus or even the Asus ZenBook S 13. We mentioned this in our review of the basic version.

When compared to the MacBook Pro 14, the Pro appears substantially bulkier and is, of course, thicker and 400 grams (0.9 lb.) heavier. However, the difference in terms of the pure footprint isn’t that significant.

Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews: Display – An IPS panel that does not use temporal dithering.

For information on the display, please see our review of the basic version. We were asked about temporal dithering in the comments section. So we used a microscope to examine the IPS panel of the Air M2 and recorded a slow-motion video at 240 frames per second.

We were able to detect temporal dithering in the recent MacBook Pro 16 with the Mini-LED panel in some specific gray color tones, but not in the old MacBook Air M1 or the new MacBook Air M2.

Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews: Apple M2 with 10 GPU cores Processor performance

We can be brief here because the processor module of the novel MacBook Air stays the same regardless of configuration. The results are nearly identical. After several runs in the Cinebench loop, we have seen a slight advantage for the basic model, and the high-end Air is also marginally faster in the final runs.

This could, however, be explained by normal distinctions between the chips themselves. In practice, the distinction is imperceptible.

Multi Constant Load Test in Cinebench R15

Because of the higher clock rate due to the M1 processor, Apple was able to improve both single and multi-core performance, but at the expense of increased power consumption. As we demonstrated in a separate article, the M2 does not run as proficiently as its predecessor in terms of processor performance.

However, even when combined with the MacBook Air’s passive cooling, the new M2 chip provides more than adequate performance for everyday work. The new Air M2 is nearly capable of competing with the 8-core M1 Pro of the MacBook Pro 14, at least in short multi-core benchmarks, while the Pro 14’s performance remains completely stable without dropping.

System Efficiency

In terms of subjective performance, we at first don’t notice any distinction between the MacBook Air M2’s basic model, particularly in everyday tasks like writing emails, watching videos, or browsing the Internet.

Even so, in some benchmarks, the extra storage capacity and faster SSD become apparent. In general, emulated programs run without issue on Rosetta 2, but native apps for Apple chips are ways of sharing and are more resource efficient.

Adobe Photoshop, as well as Premiere Pro, are two examples of apps that run acceptable as Intel versions but are considerably slower than native apps. The PugetBench results are thus only of limited utility, but they do demonstrate the benefit of the extra working memory but also faster SSD over the basic model of the MacBook Air M2.

Storage Alternative

After all of the talk about the new 256-GB SSDs in the new MacBook models, which only use a single storage chip and are thus considerably slower, the 1-TB SD in the MacBook Air M2 once again achieves the regular transfer rates of more than 3 GB/s.

Even that isn’t cutting-edge, because despite charging 460 Euros ($474) for the 1-TB SSD, it still uses an out-of-date PCIe 3.0 connection. Because it already uses the faster PCIe 4.0 models, the larger MacBook Pro 14 has a significant advantage here.

Display Card

Except for the number of cores, the GPUs of the new Apple M2 are identical, with cores having a maximum clock speed of 1,398 MHz both the basic model with 8 cores as well as the faster 10-core version. Even so, at around 13.5 watts, overall power consumption has increased slightly.

This necessitates a faster and stronger reduction in graphics performance under constant loads, such as during gaming, than was the instance in the basic model. After a few minutes, the advantage has shrunk from 19% to around 9% when compared to the M2’s 8-core GPU.

Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews: Power Management and Emissions

Power Management and Emissions
Power Management and Emissions

Emissions of Noise

The more pricey MacBook Air M2 is, of course, passively cooled, so it operates completely silently. We also didn’t hear any other electronic noises.


Because the passive cooling in both models is identical, there are no discernible differences in surface temperatures. In any case, there are no issues during normal operation, and even under high loads, Apple has a better handle on case temperatures, so you can still use the MacBook Air M2 on top of your lap without worry.

Stress Examination

We observe the same actions as in the basic model during our stress test. The M2 is allowed to shortly consume approximately 33 watts before dropping rapidly to eventually level out at a significantly reduced package power of fewer than 9 watts.


We already saw in the basic model test that the innovative speaker system of the MacBook Air M2 is very good, but not a significant improvement over the previous MacBook Air M1. The MacBook Pro 14 with additional modules outperforms once again and is only exceeded by the even bigger MacBook Pro 16.

Energy Consumption

Chip differences may play a role but our test unit also includes additional storage/RAM modules that require power. When you put a heavier load on the MacBook, you can see that the 35-Watt charger is the real limitation. Using a 100-Watt charger, we observed an optimum power consumption of gently more than 55 watts, followed by a period of 38 watts.

Life of the Battery

Because of the relatively increased power consumption, the evaluated battery life is also slightly lower than with the basic model. However, when the display brightness is set to 150 cd/m2, the runtimes in the WLAN test and then when playing videos remain exceptionally good. The battery life is reduced significantly when set to full brightness.

The bottom line

That is all about Apple Macbook Air M2 Reviews. I hope that this review can be useful to you to make a decision to buy Apple Macbook Air M2.